Looksy vs Antla

But did it sell anything?

That's the question Antla customers can't answer. Not because the app is bad — it isn't. Because nobody has the data. Zero of 29 Antla reviews mention a conversion rate, a return reduction, or a revenue number. We have those numbers. Here's what they look like.

Feature

Looksy

Antla

Try-on model

Real-context (dynamic)

Photo-upload (static AI-generated model)

Shopper uploads a photo?

No

Yes

Result reflects real shopper body

❌ AI-generated composite

Body diversity accuracy

Real body — any size, shape, or proportion appears as-is

AI-adjusted model proportions (photo upload required)

Merchant-reported conversion lift

✅ "Higher conversions" (Maison Beast)

 

Merchant-reported return reduction

✅ "Reduce returns" (Bambi)

 

Proven ROI (merchant-reported)

2/2 reviewers mention outcomes

 

ROI type

Verified (merchant-reported outcomes)

Estimated (calculator projections)

Social sharing feature

✅ (shopper endorsements)

✅ (brand assets)

Founder-level personal support

✅ product-level

✅ Aaron personally

Scales without founder involvement

App Store category

Virtual Try-On

Product Comparison & File Upload

Shopify reviews

2 (5.0★)

29 (5.0★)

Blank cells = no verified merchant data available.

Photo Upload vs. Real Try-On: What's Actually Happening in the Photo

Here's how an actual Antla merchant describes what the app does:

"Matching the person in the uploaded image to the select outfit." — Sepastone (Antla App Store review)

That's a merchant, not a marketer, describing the mechanic in plain language. And they're not wrong.

Antla's approach: a shopper uploads a photo of themselves. The AI matches the outfit to that uploaded image. The result looks like that shopper wearing the garment — rendered. An AI-generated model, wearing your product.

Looksy's approach: your shopper sees the garment on their actual self, in real context. No uploaded photo. No AI-generated composite. The try-on happens dynamically, not retrospectively.

This isn't a "features" difference. It's a philosophy difference.

One tool asks shoppers to imagine themselves in the result.
One tool removes imagination from the equation entirely.

Both are called virtual try-on. Only one of them shows your actual shopper.

One Row We Couldn't Fill In

2 reviews. 2 mention business outcomes. 29 reviews. 0 mention business outcomes.

100% of Looksy merchants who reviewed the app mentioned results — conversions, returns, or shopper behaviour. Not one of Antla's 29 reviewers did. The count difference doesn't matter. The quality difference is structural.

Looksy merchant outcomes (verbatim):

"In the month of using the app, our store has experienced higher conversions and we are seeing users actively trying stuff on. Head and shoulders above other apps that provide a try on." — Maison Beast, Estonia (★★★★★, January 2026 — also reviewed alternatives before switching to Looksy)

"Customers feel more confident before buying, which helped increase conversions and reduce returns." — Bambi, Children's Clothing, Morocco (★★★★★, January 2026)

Antla has 29 reviews. Every single one mentions: easy setup, responsive support, a good result. Fila South Africa has been using it for five months. Their review says engagement and conversion were "enhanced." No number. Not a percentage. Not a before-and-after.

We're not calling that out as a failure. We're calling it out as a category problem. The entire virtual try-on industry has been avoiding this question. Looksy is the first VTO app asking it directly. Not "does it look good?" — but "did it sell?"

Antla has since added an ROI Calculator to their homepage — a way for merchants to project potential returns from VTO before installing. That's a useful tool. But there's a meaningful difference between what Antla's calculator offers and what Looksy's merchants report.

Antla ROI: Estimated. What your store might achieve — projected, pre-install.
Looksy ROI: Verified. What merchants actually reported — in writing, post-install.

The row under Antla's name isn't blank because we forgot to fill it. It's blank because there's no verified merchant number to put there. Projections don't go in that cell. Results do.

The Social Sharing Question

Antla has a genuinely valued social sharing feature. Two of their merchants said it best:

"The share capabilities increase site visits... the sharing makes them feel like brand ambassadors." — PLAINS (South Africa)

"Gave us a new way to go viral on social media." — TEKES Fragrances IL

That's real. Antla's sharing mechanic works. Merchants love it. We're not going to pretend otherwise.

Here's the difference worth understanding:

When a shopper shares an Antla try-on, they're sharing a rendered image. An AI-composite of themselves wearing the outfit. It's a brand asset — the brand's garment, on a fabricated version of the shopper.

When a shopper shares a Looksy try-on, they're sharing themselves. Real person, real context, real result. That's a shopper endorsement — something that carries social weight in a way a rendered image doesn't.

One is content for the brand. The other is content from the customer.
Both drive clicks. One drives trust.

Support That Scales

14 of 29 Antla reviewers mention their support contact by name. That name is Aaron.

Aaron is clearly exceptional. Reviewers describe personal onboarding, same-day custom development, and direct support from the founder himself. At 47 stores, that's possible. At 470, it's not.

Looksy is built to not require that. Our onboarding takes 15 minutes without anyone's help. Our support documentation handles the common cases. When you need a person, you get one — but you don't need a person to get started. This isn't a criticism of how Antla runs. It's a statement about what scales.

Body Type Accuracy: The Methodology Difference

Antla says "any body shape." We agree the claim matters. Here's the methodology difference.

When a plus-size shopper uploads a photo to Antla, the AI generates a model, then adjusts that model's proportions to match their measurements. The result is a rendered version of someone wearing the garment — but the underlying figure is AI-fabricated. The fit, the drape, the silhouette: calculated, not shown.

Looksy works differently. The shopper's actual body appears in the try-on. Not a model adjusted to their proportions. Them.

For shoppers whose bodies differ from idealised model proportions — plus-size, curvy, athletic, petite — these two approaches produce meaningfully different experiences. The question isn't "does this VTO claim body inclusivity?" The question is: does this VTO show me, or a version of me?

Why this matters for merchants:

Purchase confidence depends on recognition. When a shopper sees themselves — not an AI-adjusted approximation — wearing a garment, the conversion moment is different. This is especially true for diverse-body shoppers who have learned not to trust standard sizing.

Maison Beast documented it directly: "customers felt more confident before buying." That confidence is harder to manufacture when the person in the try-on is AI-fabricated.

Antla's "any body shape" claim is made in good faith. The mechanism behind it is different from Looksy's. For merchants whose customers skew plus-size, curvy, or athletic — that difference is worth understanding before you install.

You've seen what both tools do. One question left.

Which one can show you what it sold?

Start your Looksy free trial — results in 15 minutes. Or talk to us about your store's return rate first.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Antla and Looksy?
Antla uses a photo-upload model — shoppers upload an image of themselves, and the AI generates a render of the outfit on that image. Looksy shows the garment on the shopper's actual body in real context, without requiring an uploaded photo. The result is a real-context try-on rather than an AI-generated composite.

Does Antla show my actual body, or an AI-generated model?
Antla generates a rendered image of a shopper wearing the outfit — one of their own merchants described it as "matching the person in the uploaded image to the select outfit." The output is an AI-generated composite, not a real-context rendering.

How does Looksy compare to other virtual try-on apps on ROI?
Antla has added an ROI Calculator to their homepage — a projection tool that shows what your store might achieve before installation. That is estimated ROI. Antla's 29 App Store reviews tell a different story: zero of 29 merchants mention specific conversion rate improvements, return reductions, or revenue impact numbers. Looksy's 2/2 reviewers mention business outcomes. Projections don't go in the merchant-outcomes row. Results do.

Does Antla have an ROI calculator?
Yes, Antla features an ROI projection tool on their homepage. However, it uses industry-average estimates rather than data from actual merchant deployments. Looksy's ROI resources are grounded in verified session data from real Shopify stores — so the output reflects what merchants at your scale have actually seen, not modelled projections.

Does Looksy's virtual try-on work for plus-size and diverse body types?
Yes. Looksy shows the garment on the shopper's actual body — not a model adjusted to their proportions. For plus-size, curvy, athletic, and petite shoppers, this means the try-on reflects how the garment actually looks on their physique, not a calculated approximation. The methodology contrast with photo-upload VTO tools is meaningful for merchants whose customers span a wide range of body types.

Available on Shopify

Available on Shopify

Get instant access to our in-page, no-modal try-on with 20 free try-ons included. No commitment. Just a quick, hands-on preview of how Looksy works inside your store.

Get instant access to our in-page, no-modal try-on with 20 free try-ons included. No commitment. Just a quick, hands-on preview of how Looksy works inside your store.

Zero Risk
Direct founder onboarding
Priority feature requests
Lifetime priority support
Before and after comparison showing AI virtual try-on results for clothing fit
Before and after comparison showing AI virtual try-on results for clothing fit
Before and after comparison showing AI virtual try-on results for clothing fit